Resilient model delivery

Route for cost, capability, and continuity—not guesswork.

Build compatible provider pools, distribute traffic across credentials, and fail over only when policy says the alternative is safe.

Working sandbox capture
Resilient model delivery controls in the working console.Current interface evidence: Strategy visible · Targets eligible · Fallback bounded. This sanitized capture contains no customer secrets or prompt bodies.
Priority, weighted, request-cost, and health-aware strategies
Bounded retries, fallback, and circuit availability
Capability-aware fallback that preserves required API contracts
In plain language

Your applications keep one endpoint while your options keep changing.

Instead of embedding a provider decision and API key in every application, administrators define reusable route pools. A pool states which models and credentials are eligible, how they should be ranked, and exactly when a fallback is allowed. Builders call a stable gateway alias; operators can change the supply path without asking every team to redeploy.

The practical resultProvider outages, exhausted quotas, and price changes become controlled operating events rather than emergency code changes.
For the operating team

A route is a documented decision tree, not a hidden algorithm.

Platform and operations teams control eligibility first, optimization second, and fallback last.

What administrators configure
Compatible targets

Specify provider, account, model, region, capabilities, context limits, and streaming support.

Selection strategy

Choose priority, weighted distribution, health-aware ordering, or estimated request cost.

Failure boundary

Cap attempts, time, cost, cooldown, and capability changes before a fallback is permitted.

Exact-cache boundary

Opt in per route to short-lived, workload-isolated repeat responses without durable prompt or response storage; streaming and tool calls bypass it.

Change recovery

Compare retained route releases and restore a known-good configuration as a new, reason-coded version that must pass current safety checks.

What happens to each request
  1. 01
    Authenticate

    Resolve the tenant, workload key, user context, and client mode before considering a provider.

  2. 02
    Constrain

    Remove targets that violate model, capability, budget, risk, or environment policy.

  3. 03
    Select

    Rank eligible credentials and models by the configured priority, weight, health, or estimated request cost.

  4. 04
    Reconcile

    Serve a governed exact-cache hit or call the selected provider, then record the decision and reconcile reserved budget.

See the working control

Troubleshoot from the decision, not from a prompt archive.

The live ledger shows workload, route, reason code, upstream attempt, outcome, latency, configured cost, and audit-chain integrity.

  • Rendered by the real customer console and control API
  • Exercised with safe OpenAI- and Anthropic-compatible simulators
  • Sanitization gate rejects credential-shaped values and private owner email
Follow the operating workflow
Request evidenceTroubleshoot from the decision, not from a prompt archive.

The live ledger shows workload, route, reason code, upstream attempt, outcome, latency, configured cost, and audit-chain integrity.

Control surface

Useful on day one. Explainable on day one hundred.

Each control has an operating path, an owner, and evidence that can be reviewed without collecting prompt bodies by default.

01

One stable endpoint

Applications use familiar OpenAI and Anthropic interfaces while administrators change providers, accounts, models, and limits centrally.

02

Every attempt is accountable

The ledger records the requested model, selected target, retries, fallback reason, latency, reserved estimate, supported provider-reported settlement, and final result without retaining prompt bodies.

03

Availability without accidental spend

Hedging stays off by default. Retries and fallbacks have explicit time, attempt, cost, capability, and data-location boundaries.

Evidence, not assertions

Explain why this target handled this request.

The request ledger separates requested model, selected target, retry, fallback, upstream outcome, gateway latency, reserved estimate, and supported provider-reported settlement.

Review security boundaries and current status
  • Reason-coded policy, route, retry, fallback, and denial metadata
  • Bounded tool names, types, MCP hosts, and authorization outcomes—without schemas, arguments, or results
  • Provider-reported usage reconciliation for complete responses and supported terminal streams
  • Tenant-bound credential encryption and fail-closed tenant authorization
  • Signed, retryable administrative audit delivery with payloads and configuration snapshots excluded
  • Clear labels separating available controls from items that still require validation
Questions teams ask

Know the boundary before you deploy.

Clear answers for buyers, administrators, and security reviewers.

Will a fallback silently remove a required capability?

No fallback is eligible unless its configured capability profile satisfies the request. Administrators still need to validate exact provider and model behavior before production use.

Can we balance several keys for the same provider?

Yes. Credentials can participate in a pool and be selected under priority, weighted, health, quota-cooldown, or request-cost rules without exposing the underlying key to the client.

Does cost routing always pick the cheapest model?

No. It picks the least-cost target remaining after policy, capability, context, budget, and health constraints. A cheap but ineligible target is never considered.

Can repeated requests avoid another provider charge?

Yes, when an administrator enables the exact-response cache for that route. Identical non-streaming JSON requests from the same workload key can reuse a bounded volatile response for 30 seconds to one hour. Current budgets, rate limits, platform billing, and response guardrails still run; tool-bearing and idempotent requests bypass it.

Can an operator undo a bad routing change?

Yes. The route console compares retained releases and can restore an earlier configuration. The restore creates a new version, records who did it and why, preserves the route's current active or disabled state, and is rejected if the older configuration no longer satisfies current credential, provider, model, or tenant safety checks.

Start safely

See what the policy would do before it can block production.

Connect a provider credential, create a workload key, and begin in Observe mode. Move a tested rule to Enforce when your team is ready.

Start guided setup