Spend coverage
Start with the portion of AI spend that can be assigned, reconciled, and reviewed—not a guessed “waste” percentage.
Enter six portfolio-level inputs. See which spend lacks an owner, an operating outcome, or provider-bill reconciliation—and how much work it takes to assemble the current view.
Use portfolio totals or one company. Nothing entered here is submitted or stored.
Coverage gaps overlap. They are shown separately and are never added together as “savings.”
This browser-only baseline identifies missing operating evidence. It does not calculate or guarantee cost savings, productivity, EBITDA impact, valuation, or return on investment.
Invoices answer what was charged. An operating review also needs ownership, business intent, outcome evidence, and a reproducible source chain.
Read the measurement method Build the operating reviewStart with the portion of AI spend that can be assigned, reconciled, and reviewed—not a guessed “waste” percentage.
Keep KPIs and OKRs distinct, and record the evidence that supports either one without treating correlation as causation.
Use repeatable calculations for the baseline. Leave accounting, valuation, materiality, and investment judgment with named reviewers.
No. It identifies how much entered spend lacks a named owner, KPI or OKR linkage, or provider-bill reconciliation. Those evidence gaps must be resolved before a defensible ROI conclusion can be made.
No. The public calculator runs in the browser and does not submit or store the values entered.
Yes. Use combined portfolio totals for an initial baseline, then establish company-approved source and access boundaries before comparing individual portfolio companies in the product.
Use a free workspace for governed operating evidence, or define a bounded portfolio review before any company shares financial or AI usage data.