Design for ePHI handling
Provider eligibility and telemetry decisions are explicit, but retention enforcement and regional/dedicated cells remain required work.
The architecture limits stored metadata and is designed with later BAA and dedicated-deployment needs in mind. No compliance status is claimed before the required agreements and reviews are complete.
Healthcare readiness is more than encryption or a badge. The service begins with minimized hosted telemetry, tenant-bound credentials, explicit workload/data context, and provider eligibility controls. A BAA, risk analysis, retention validation, workforce procedure, vendor review, and deployment boundary are still required before ePHI use.
Treat provider contracts, data class, region, retention, support, incident response, and deployment model as release gates.
Require an explicit data class and prohibit regulated traffic from unapproved routes.
Limit credentials and models to reviewed accounts, contracts, regions, and telemetry behavior.
Document BAA, risk analysis, procedures, training, incident handling, and validation before ePHI.
Use explicit workload and data-class context; never infer authorization from a model name alone.
Limit eligible providers, models, credentials, and telemetry before the request can leave the gateway.
Run the tested rule in Observe, Shadow, or Enforce according to the approved rollout stage.
Retain metadata evidence and administrative change history for authorized operational review.
For healthcare safeguards, versioned profiles screen prompt attacks before spend and sensitive output before release. They also limit the tool names, types, and MCP hosts a model may use. Schemas, arguments, and results are not retained.
For healthcare safeguards, versioned profiles screen prompt attacks before spend and sensitive output before release. They also limit the tool names, types, and MCP hosts a model may use. Schemas, arguments, and results are not retained.
For healthcare teams, the console shows each setting, its owner, and its scope so administrators can review changes before they reach live traffic.
Provider eligibility and telemetry decisions are explicit, but retention enforcement and regional/dedicated cells remain required work.
Customers bring provider credentials today. A release-candidate buyer-owned AWS Bedrock data plane is limited to a documented us-east-1 boundary; customer-managed KMS and regulated-workload approval are not included.
BAA execution, risk analysis, policies, workforce procedures, vendor review, and validated operations are required before any HIPAA use.
The trust center separates implemented controls, deployment dependencies, unavailable capabilities, and assurance that still requires an independent review.
Review security boundaries and current statusWhat buyers, administrators, and security reviewers need to confirm for for healthcare teams.
No. AI Gateway HQ does not currently claim HIPAA readiness or offer a BAA. Use only non-sensitive test data until contractual, administrative, and technical gates are completed.
The hosted gateway is designed not to persist prompt or response bodies by default. Provider retention and application logging remain separate customer review responsibilities.
A release-candidate buyer-owned AWS package now implements a private-VPC Bedrock path, paid-period entitlement, read-only verification, buyer-approved update, and removal flow. It is not approved for ePHI and remains gated on a fresh external acceptance run before general availability.
Start with a provider connection, a limited workload key, and Observe mode; move to enforcement after your team confirms the result.