Comparison · reviewed August 7, 2026

AI Gateway HQ vs. LiteLLM

A managed control plane without handing customers a proxy, database, master key, or upgrade burden.

  • Pre-dispatch control
  • Operator-ready evidence
  • Prompt storage off by default
Working sandbox capture
This is the product—not a concept rendering.A capture from the working test environment shows the controls and evidence described in this comparison. Open it full-size to inspect the interface.
Why teams choose AI Gateway HQ

Choose AI Gateway HQ when the organization wants accountable AI service operations—not a proxy project to assemble, patch, secure, and explain. LiteLLM is compelling when engineering explicitly wants source access and accepts responsibility for the database, master-key, upgrade, and enterprise-control stack.

AI Gateway HQ ships tenant-bound credential encryption, workload keys, guided routing and policy setup, prepaid accounting, support authorization, and a managed AWS deployment as one service boundary.

Capability evidence

Compare the operating boundary.

AI Gateway HQ entries describe implemented product behavior. Alternative entries summarize the linked first-party documentation—not anonymous review scores.

Decision areaWhat AI Gateway HQ deliversWhat LiteLLM documents
Gateway and routing

One OpenAI/Anthropic-compatible endpoint; encrypted multi-account BYOK pools; capability-first priority, weighted, request-cost, health, and request-aware provider-capacity selection; shared quota cooldowns and bounded, reason-coded fallback.

Open-source OpenAI-format proxy across 100+ providers with routing, fallback, load balancing, logging, and Prometheus integration.

Spend enforcement

Atomic organization-and-workload reservation before forwarding, strict rate and concurrency enforcement, explicit output caps, and settlement against supported provider-reported usage. Promotional credit cannot fund server-paid model exposure.

Virtual keys, user/team budgets, rate limits, and spend tracking. Its official virtual-key setup requires a PostgreSQL database and a proxy master key, so self-hosters own that security and availability boundary.

Identity and governance

OIDC administration, mandatory MFA, built-in least-privilege roles, virtual workload keys, signed execution context, Observe/Shadow/Enforce policy, and local jailbreak, injection, exfiltration, encoding, and Unicode risk signals.

Enterprise advertises SSO, SCIM, OIDC/JWT, audit logs, secret managers, and key rotation—a broader identity surface.

Deployment and evidence

WAF-protected AWS serverless deployment, tenant-bound KMS encryption, signed releases, payload-free request metadata by default, tamper-evident audit exports, and customer-approved time-bounded support access.

Free self-hosted proxy plus Enterprise multi-region, air-gapped, and managed support options.

Public commercial model

A free BYOK proving tier, then $0.10 per 1,000 successful Flex requests with no percentage markup on inference purchased through customer-owned provider accounts; higher-control plans are scoped by operating requirements.

Open-source self-hosting is $0 software cost; Enterprise uses custom annual request-capacity and support pricing.

When to consider LiteLLM

Consider LiteLLM when source customization, self-hosting, or its very broad provider adapter catalog is the primary requirement.

Comparison method

Facts were reviewed from the linked first-party documentation and pricing pages on August 7, 2026. Public meters are not normalized: requests, logs, credits, infrastructure, and enterprise capacity are different units. Revalidate pricing and capabilities before purchasing.